Monday, November 24, 2014

Collections Part 2: Map

It's time to talk about the Map.

Sometimes we need to store and retrieve information based on its relationship to other information in a keyed fashion.  There are a lot of reasons for this, but for the purpose of this post we'll pretend that we want to store product descriptions based on item numbers.

So I have a store, where I sell an eclectic group of items:

Item #Item Name
100001Tooth straightener
100002Dust Collection
100101Pickled Snail Shell
100201Odor Vent
200001Checkerboard Paint
200101Toenail Fastener

Oddly, business has not been very good lately.

 Now, if I wanted to computerize my system, I might decide that I wanted a way to have the system display the description of an item when the item number was entered (or selected from a list, or something).

 Let me start by saying it would be entirely possible to create two parallel arrays of String variables, such that itemNumbers[0] contains "100001" and itemNames[0] contains "Tooth straightener".  One could search through the first array for the item number for which you were looking, take the index value you found and display the value from the second array.  This can get a bit clumsy, and it would take a lot of work to keep everything in sync, but it could work just fine (albeit a bit slowly when the number of items gets large).  Adding items would be relatively easy.  Deleting them would be annoying, because you'd have to move all the items down.  There are other ways you could do it, too.

But doesn't the following seem quite natural and easy?

    //Get name of item based on item number
    String itemName = products.get(itemNumber);

    //Add new item type to product list
    products.put(newItemNumber, newItemName);

    //Remove obsolete item type from product list

Enter the Map.

A Map is a Collections framework interface designed for just this purpose.  Keyed lookups like this are very handy, and the Map makes it easy to set up, too.

Like List, Map is just an interface.  You will need to create an actual object that implements the Map interface in order to use one, and the most likely candidate is the HashMap.

So your code would look like this:

In the old days, before generics:

    Map products = new HashMap();

Or if you're working in this century:

    Map<String, String> products = new HashMap<String, String>();

The two object types are the key and the value data types, respectively.

Friday, November 21, 2014

Collections Part 1: List

Let's talk about Collections.  I don't mean baseball cards...  or dust.  I'm talking about the Collections framework, which is a powerful set of classes included with your Java distribution.

This is not meant to be an in depth tutorial.  I'm merely going to scratch the surface and give a few guidelines regarding basic use of the framework.

The Collections framework is incredibly important to the Java developer.  You will spend a great deal of time working with the data structures within it.  The two that you will most likely use more than any other are List and Map.

List and Map are not classes.  They are interfaces.  An interface can be thought of as the set of controls for a range of classes.  Much like you might have a gas powered or electric powered oven, you still turn a dial and set a desired temperature.  The interface is the same, although the implementation is different.  This is a key concept:  Code to the Interface is commonly said, and slightly less commonly actually done.  I will do other posts on this idea, it's very important.

Let's start with List.  We'll do Map in another post.

Suppose I wanted to keep track of a few numbers read in from a file.  Each line contains one number, but I don't know how big the file is.  While it would be possible to load the numbers into an array, it would be a bit messy, as I would have to manage the size of the array.  Enter the 'ArrayList'.  This is a Collections based object that works very much like an Array with a turbocharger on it.  I don't have any hard numbers on this, but my suspicion is that it is the most commonly used Collections class out there.

Let's say my pseudocode looks something like this:

Open a file

For each line in the file:

    Read an integer number from the file
    Store the integer in a list for later use

Generate a sum of all the integers in the list as SumTotal
Display SUM to the user

There are multiple paths to success of course, and it's hard to say that any given solution is exactly 'wrong'.  However, unless we know in advance how many values we're going to store, or we wildly oversize the initial allocation, using an array would require us to modify the length of the array regularly.  It's not that this is particularly hard, but it's even easier not to do it.

And let's face it:  One of the secrets of successful programming is doing things the easy way.  It's a hard enough job, there's no reason to add unnecessary bells, whistles and epicycles to our code.

I'm not going to address the bits about reading the file right now, that will be in another post.  I just want to concentrate on 'Store the integer in a list for later use' and 'Generate a sum of all the integers in the list as SumTotal'.

First, we have to create the ArrayList object.  I'm going to do so in a way I haven't shown you before, but it's not too awful to understand:

List<Integer> numberList = new ArrayList<Integer>();


Well, honestly Java can deal with this without having those '<Integer>' parts, but I thought you ought to get used to using them.  They're really handy for preventing certain classes of errors when programs get bigger.

What this is doing is creating a variable called 'numberList'.  It is an object of type 'List', and that 'List' is constrained to hold only Integer values.  That's the reason for the syntax, it makes sure we don't do something silly like try to put a String or a PersonData in there.

List is NOT a class.  You cannot create a 'new List()' directly.  It is what's known as an interface, and essentially describes how to use a category of classes, rather than one single class.

ArrayList IS a class.  You could do this if you so choose:

ArrayList<Integer> sillyNumberList = new ArrayList<Integer>();

This is roughly akin to adding the name of the manufacturer before mentioning an appliance.  Every time.  You wouldn't tell someone to go get you a beer from the Acme refrigerator, you'd just say refrigerator.  The fact that it's an Acme was only important when you bought it (or when you need to have it repaired.  Don't ask me about refrigerator repair, it's a sore spot).  The fact that it's a refrigerator means that you will grab a handle, pull it, and find something yummy and cold inside.  The specific manufacturer does not matter.  Similarly, a List allows you to add items, remove items, look at items and such, all without having to know that it is specifically an ArrayList.

Let's imagine that we've now got a value we want to add as an Integer, in a variable called 'numberToAddToList' (imaginative, huh?)  We'd just do this:


No muss, no fuss, no checking capacity.  Set it and forget it.  You can do this once, or a thousand times or more.  That one line is all you'll need to use.

The other bit we need to work on is generating a sum of the numbers.  The way to do this, of course, is to take all the numbers, one by one, and add them to a variable that started at zero.  I'm going to do this three times here.  The first time using a for loop the way we've already done.  Next, I'll do so using an 'Iterator', which is a helper type designed to go through all the items in a Collection one by one, has been around forever, and is oftentimes a better choice than a standard for loop.  The last is using the 'enhanced' for loops that have been in the Java spec for a few years now.  None of these ways are strictly wrong, but if I was reviewing your code I'd want to see or hear a good reason for not doing it the third way.

Integer sumTotal = 0;

for (int i = 0; i < numberList.size(); i++ ) {
    sumTotal = sumTotal = numberlist.get(i);

Iterator<Integer> iter = numberList.iterator();
while(iter.hasNext()) {
    sumTotal = sumTotal +;

for(Integer number : numberList) {
    sumTotal = sumTotal + number;

In all cases, we'd just then write:

System.out.println("The total is " + sumTotal);

As I think you can see, the new enhanced for loop makes life pretty easy.  You declare a variable and state where it comes from, and then just use it in the loop.

The iterator probably looks pretty awful to you, and to be fair, that's the cleaned up version available to us since we got to start using Generics.  Back before we could add that <Integer> tag it would have looked like this:
Iterator iter = numberList.Iterator();
while(iter.hasNext()) {
    sumTotal = sumTotal + (Integer)(;

But it was still a useful construct quite often.  Naturally in small examples like these the full impact does not show itself.

List can be used for much more than numbers of course.  Any sort of Object can be stored in a list.  You can have a List of Strings, or a List of Lists, or a List of Maps...

Next time, we'll discuss Maps, which instead of sequential access specialize in looking up specific objects based on a key value.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Don't Treat me Like an Object

I originally posted this on Reddit, and got some positive feedback on it, so I thought I would put it up here as an early lesson in object orientation.  That is, after all, our goal here and a dozen posts in I haven't really mentioned it at all yet.

Moving from procedural code to object oriented code is a major leap and takes a real adjustment in thinking.
Very often, multiple pieces of data logically belong together. For instance, a person's given name and family name should generally not be separated. There's little point in having separate references to "John" and "Doe", after all.
This concept existed before object oriented programming did, in the form of 'structures'. In c we'd do this
struct PersonData {
    char givenName[20];
    char surname[20];
Which helped some. Now we could declare a variable of type PersonData and pass it around, knowing that the fields would be kept together. Believe it or not that was a big step forward.  Of course a bit of energy was spent on doing things like determining if '20' was enough storage for a name.  
Objects are basically structs with functions added, and with the ability to hide internal details from users of said objects.
So while it would be possible to recreate the above struct as an object like this:
public class PersonData {
    public String givenName;
    public String surName;
That doesn't really take advantage of the power of the language yet. Sure, we can now go:
PersonData johnDoe = new PersonData(); //Use default constructor that comes free
johnDoe.givenName = "John";
johnDoe.surName  = "Doe";
But we can do better. For instance, a person ALWAYS has those names, right?  So why allow a PersonData object to even be created without them? Enter the 'Constructor'. It's just a method designed for one purpose: To initialize a new object. We could insert the following into our PersonData class:
public PersonData(String given, String sur) {
    givenName = given;
    surName = sur;
And now we could write the earlier code like this:
PersonData johnDoe = new PersonData("John", "Doe");
This PersonData is quite limited as it stands right now, since it's got no methods on it. But you know, that's OK, there's a place for objects that just store data, too. It is, however, a starting point to think about how objects work.
Of course, a constructor can do much more than set values for a few fields, too, performing any sorts of setup and initialization that might be required.
Please note, I am not saying that exposing those variables as public is a good idea, and I would not write them quite that way for a production application, but I'm trying to keep this example simple to understand.

Since whenever you write Java code you're forced to put it into classes anyway, I suggest that you always treat your classes as though they're going to be objects.  Make your main() methods as minimal as possible.  In short,don't do this:

public class InputData {
    public static void main(String args[]) {
        Scanner s = new Scanner(;
        while(s.hasNextLine()) {

Instead, write it like this from the start:

public class InputData {
    public static void main(String args[]) {
        InputData inputData = new InputData();

    public void inputData() {
        Scanner s = new Scanner(;
        while (s.hasNextLine()) {

Note that by adding just a few lines I've turned this into slightly more object oriented code.  I've avoided the static cascade problem.  I've also made it so that if I want to I can use this object from some other piece of code without a great deal of trouble.  That code I have in main could be duplicated anywhere.

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Arrays: A new dimension

Let's revisit arrays and take them quite literally to the next level.

To recap:  An array is a means for storing multiple values of the same kind.  Those kinds can be ints.  Those kinds can be Strings.  Those kinds can be...  other arrays.

The simplest way to think of this is to picture a grid.

int [] [] twoDArray = new int [3][3];

Would generate something akin to this:


Each of the empty boxes can hold an int value.

The type of twoDArray[0] is 'int []'.

To process ALL of the cells in this block you'd most likely write a nested set of for loops:

for (int i = 0; i < 3; i ++) {
    for (int j = 0; j < 3; j++ ) {
        System.out.println(i + ", " + j + ": " + twoDArray [i] [j] );

Now the grid analogy breaks down just a bit when you make an array more complicated.  For instance, each row could have a different number of columns.  If you were building a more sophisticated application you would probably not want to hard-code the size of the arrays in your loops, but would be more likely to use:

for (int i = 0; i < twoDArray.length; i++) {
    for (int j = 0; j < twoDArray[i].length; j++) {

But the principle is the same.  

By way of example, let's make a table of five rows, where each row has one more column than the last.  We'll populate each cell with the product of the row and column indexes:

int [] [] twoDArray = new int [5][];

for (int i = 0; i < 5; i ++) {
twoDArray [i] = new int[i+1]; //NOTE THIS!  For each row we create a new row of boxes of the correct length.
for (int j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
twoDArray [i] [j] = i*j;


To print out the contents one could simply write this:

for (int i = 0; i < twoDArray.length ; i ++) {
for (int j = 0; j < twoDArray [i].length ; j++) {
System.out.println(i + ", " + j + ": " + twoDArray [i] [j] );

Which would generate the following output:

0, 0: 0
1, 0: 0
1, 1: 1
2, 0: 0
2, 1: 2
2, 2: 4
3, 0: 0
3, 1: 3
3, 2: 6
3, 3: 9
4, 0: 0
4, 1: 4
4, 2: 8
4, 3: 12
4, 4: 16

It would certainly possible to put this into a more readable format if one wished, of course.

For instance, if you changed the code to this:

for (int i = 0; i < twoDArray.length ; i ++) {
for (int j = 0; j < twoDArray [i].length ; j++) {
System.out.print( twoDArray [i] [j] );
if (j < (twoDArray [i].length - 1)) {
else {

We've introduced something I haven't used before on this blog.  While System.out.println should be familiar, we also have System.out.print.  It's basically the same thing, but it doesn't end by creating a new line.  This gives us the option to add more text after it.  System.out.println() with no arguments just ends the current line of output.

The output from the above would therefore take the following form:


Which closely matches the table up above.  Naturally, if the arrays had been created in a more complex manner the output would reflect that.

This concept can be extended to three, four, or 12 dimensions if you so choose.  Mind you, it gets mighty hard to visualize past three,  Just remember that the content of an array cell can be pretty much anything, including another array.

Monday, November 17, 2014

Arrays of Golden Sun

We've seen processing of simple integer values already, but what if you have to deal with a bunch of them?  Perhaps you have 20 test results and want to do something with them.

I suppose we could write something like this:

int testResult1;
int testResult2;
int testResult3;

Then we could write a calculateAverage function...

int calculateAverage(int testResult1, int testResult2, int testResult3..

You know, I'm already tired of typing that, and I've got a whole lot more to go.  And you just know that next year there will be 22 tests, right?

Never fear, we aren't stuck with such awfulness.  Java (as with most languages) supports the concept of arrays.  Don't fear the word, the concept is actually pretty simple to grasp.

First, let's go back and deal with testResult1.  We can think of that variable as being a box that holds a number.  We can put a number in the box, or we can ask the box what number is in it.

testResult1 = 97;  //We've just put 97 into the box

System.out.println("Your first test result was " + testResult1 ); // We've just asked the box what number is in it.

All the operations boil down to one of those.  If we do math, we're just asking what's in the box.  If we reassign the number (like 'testResult1 ++') we're really just asking what's inside, making a new number and putting the new one into the box.  Whatever was in the box before is gone once you do this, there's no room for two numbers.  These are pretty simplistic boxes.

So, I can conceive of 'testResult1' through 'testResult20' as being a row of 20 boxes, each of which I can use to store or retrieve a number.  But man, it's going to be annoying to do much useful work with individually addressable variables like that.

Enter the array.

Let's just take that same row of 20 boxes and relabel them.  In fact, let's glue them together in a long line and give the whole spiel one single label.  We'll call it 'testResults'.

Of course, testResults is not an int.  It's a grouping of 20 ints.  That's going to make it slightly more difficult to do math on it.  Enter the square bracket and the array index.

If we want to refer to the item in the first box, first we have to get over a little hump.  For reasons we do not really need to get into now, just trust me that they're valid, the first box is number 0, not 1.  So, what we previously would have called 'testResult1' can now be called 'testResults[0]'.  It is important to understand that 'testResults' is NOT an integer.  However, testResults[0] (or testResults[13]) IS an integer and is just a marker for one of the boxes in our row.

I know, that seems a bit more difficult at first, but it turns out not to be.  Here's why:

Remember before?  We had to declare testResult1, testResult2, etc. on individual lines?

Well now we can just do:

int [] testResults = new int [ 20 ];

We've specified that testResults is not an int, but an array of ints with the '[]' notation.  We've made it have 20 boxes with 'new int [ 20 ]'.  (This can be done live at runtime, you could do 'new int [ someCalculatedValue ]').  In one fell swoop we've made storage space for 20 individual (but related) integer values.  It gets better.

The 'calculateAverage' function can now be declared like this:

int calculateAverage( int [] valuesToAverage ) {

Well isn't that a whole lot easier?  And you can imagine that before, that calculateAverage method would have had to look something like this:

return (value1 + value2 + value3 + ... + value20) / 20;

Which seems like it takes up a lot of valuable real estate on screen, and, as mentioned before, is irritating to change.

Our new version takes advantage of the fact that the array is indexed (it could do more but I'll talk about that later):

float total = 0;

for (int i = 0; i < 20; i ++ ) {
    total = total + valuesToAverage[i];
return total / 20f;

That's the whole thing.  I didn't even get tired.

Of course, this can be improved further.  What if there aren't 20 values in the array?  What if there are 12?  We could change the code, or we could let the array tell us how big it is:

float total = 0;
float valueCount = valuesToAverage.length;

for (int i = 0; i < valueCount; i++ ) {
    total = total + valuesToAverage[i];
return total/valueCount;

Now we have a completely generic method for averaging any number of integer values we want, that we will never have to change again.  All we need to do is make sure before using it that the array we're passing in is sized correctly and populated.  We can stash that into a utility class somewhere and use it for years.

Naturally none of this is going to work without stashing numbers in the array in the first place.

One can initialize an array with hard coded values:

int [] testScores = { 100, 95, 22, 84 };

Or one can write code to set the values.  Assuming we have appropriate helper functions in place, this kind of thing could work.  It's more likely that you'd be getting input from the user or a file for your early experiments with the language.  I think we'll talk about those soon.

int [] testScores = new int[ getNumberOfScores() ];
for ( int i = 0; i < getNumberOfScores(); i++ ) {
    testScores[i] = getScore(i);

Of course, that's just the tip of the array iceberg, but I think it gets across the main points:


  1. Are just ordered, indexed lists of the data types we already understand
  2. Can be passed as single labels but all the internal values are readily available
  3. Contain 'meta' information about their contents, particularly how many items they hold
  4. Can make many data processing tasks easier to code and understand
If you're having trouble with this concept, please let me know.  It's good to have a firm grounding in basic aggregate data structures like this before we move on to more complex topics.  Much of what we do in programming involves understanding some concept, then not using it directly, but instead using higher level structures that are better handled if you know what's going on underneath.

View Code

The Old Switcheroo

Let's talk about the 'switch' statement for a bit.  This is a form of conditional that is better suited to some tasks than if/else.

First, let's look at the structure of a switch:

switch(variable) {
    case value1:
        //Code to execute for value1

    case value2:
        //Code to execute for value1 or value2

    case value3:
        //Code to execute for value3

        //Code for any value other than the three above

// Done with switch

In detail.

If variable is equal to value1, we execute the code under 'case value1', then we 'break', which means we exit the current block (jump to 'Done with switch').

If variable is equal to value2, we execute the code under 'case value2', then continue to execute the code under 'case value3' before we hit the 'break' and head out to 'Done with switch'.

If variable has any other value, we execute the code under 'default'.

This is basically equivalent to:

if (variable == value1 || variable == value2) {
    if (variable == value1) {
        //Code to execute for value1;
    //Code to execute for value1 or value2
else if (variable == value3) {
    //Code to execute for value3
else {
    Code for any value other than the three above

But I think in this case the switch is a bit easier to follow.

Sadly, the switch works with only a limited number of data types.  Basically it will work for atomic types that represent integer values, the objects that wrap those atomic types (like Integer or Long), and String.  It will also work with Enumerations, but I haven't written about those yet...  I guess I should get to those soon.

So, let's combine a for loop with a switch statement to get some output, shall we?

        for (int switchValue = 0; switchValue < 5; switchValue ++) {
            switch (switchValue) {
                case 0:
                    System.out.println("Just starting out.");

                case 1:
                    System.out.println("Making progress.");

                case 4:
                    System.out.println("All done.");

                case 5:
                    System.out.println("We will never get here.");

                    System.out.println("Getting there...");

This runs a simple loop that goes from 0 to 4.  Along the way, we run a switch to execute various blocks of code based on that value.  The output from this block of code looks like this:

Just starting out.
Making progress.
Getting there...
Getting there...
All done.

If you follow the code, I hope this makes sense to you.  The 'default' statement catches anything that isn't 0, 1, 4 or 5, so it runs a couple of times in the middle.  If this is not clear, drop me a line and I'll try to improve it.

If I, if I, if I, if I Didn't Love you else I'd Hate You

At this point I'm sure I've written a bunch of if statements in various examples, but I want to discuss a few specifics.

So far, I've used only the simplest form:

if ( someConditionIsTrue ) {

It actually doesn't get TOO much more complicated than that, but let's go into it anyway.

Let me just talk about what I mean by 'someConditionIsTrue':  What I mean is that we are evaluating what is within the parenthesis in order to determine whether the Java language considers this to be a 'true' value.  That doesn't mean some kind of universal truth, and it doesn't mean that it knows better than we do.  All it means is that if the language structure causes the boolean value 'true' to come out, we pass the test.  All of the following are 'true' to Java:


! false

1 == 1

1 != 53

(1+1) == 2

(1+2) == (4-1)

And it gets more complicated than that.  There are all sorts of expressions one can evaluate for truth, many times they are based on previous work your program has done.  You might for instance have a user enter their birth date, compare it against the current date, and decide that 'true' means 'older than 21 years'.  All you have to do is construct the expression correctly in order to suit the language's ability to decide based on what it considers to be truth.

OK, but what if someCondition ISN'T true?  The block doesn't execute, and we go on to the next line after the closing bracket, right?  But what if we want to do something because the condition is not true?

I guess we could do this:

if (conditionIsTrue) {

if (conditionIsTrue == false) {

In fact, that would work fine.  Of course, if 'doStuff()' as a side effect changed the condition to false you would wind up executing both blocks.  I mean sure, doStuff() SHOULDN'T change that value, that's bad practice, but as an old C programmer I know very well that "shouldn't" doesn't necessarily mean "doesn't".

Besides, there's a cleaner way to express that concept:

if (conditionIsTrue) {
else {

Isn't that better?  It makes the intention clear, it's less prone to side effects, and you finally get that one joke some programmer made on that forum you don't want anyone to know you visit.

You use 'else' to do things when the condition in an 'if' statement is false.  This will come in handy, and I'm sure I'll be using it soon in examples, so I wanted to make you familiar with it.

Another thing I should point out is that sometimes we need to make decisions based on not just simple true/false values, but combinations of such values.  maybe a user can be considered a 'favored customer' if they have either been a customer for two years or they have spent at least $1,000.00 with us.  That's where we get into what is called 'boolean logic'.  This is not too difficult to understand, and it's critical to get it locked down into your memory.  Please see the earlier post 'Hooray for Boo...leans' to get more information about this.  Just understand that almost anywhere that we can do a simple check for true/false, we can probably extend it to a more involved expression involving multiple terms combined in various ways.

View code here

Friday, November 14, 2014

Hooray for Boo..leans

I've mentioned booleans before, and it's critical to understand both boolean variables and boolean logic.  A great deal can be accomplished with booleans, for good or for ill.  You can make your programs sing or you can make yourself cry depending on how well you understand what you're doing.

I'm going to use the good old 'if' statement a lot in this post, but the same concepts apply to any conditional, such as while loops.

About the simplest possible boolean tests would be:

if (true) {


if (false) {

In fact, they're so simple that the java compiler should entirely remove either the test (in the first case) or the entire code block (in the second).  But logically, the first conditional should simply always execute whatever statement follows, and the second should just bypass the statement.

A more likely scenario would be this:

while(true) {

This is what is known as an infinite loop, which is handy when you mean it and devastating when you don't.  Create a while loop with a boolean condition that, due to some error, never switches to false, and you've got yourself a program that looks like it has 'locked up', when really it's happily executing the same thing over and over and over again.

Of course, most of the time you're going to be using logic, not constants, to determine how a conditional statement behaves.  This sort of thing is extremely common:

if ( someValue > 5 ) {

This expression, using the 'greater-than' conditional operator, evaluates to true if someValue is 6, or 22, or 25,101,793.  Just so long as it's more than five.  If it's five (or less) , it evaluates to false.  Say, that could come in handy...

Of course, you can also check for a value being less than another value with '<', or equal to another value with '=='.  You can get quickly more complex if you wish:

if ( value1 * 3 < value2 / 2 ) {

Is a perfectly valid expression.  Of course, you'd have to work out what values will do what, but it's not too conceptually difficult to understand that this will pass if value1 is 1 and value2 is 36, but fail if value1 is 1 and value2 is 2.

Boolean expressions can also be subjected to boolean operators, to evaluate more complex conditions.  For instance, let's say you've offering a discount to people who have been customers longer than five years AND have total orders of more than 1,000 dollars.  While you could write that as nested if statements:

if ( yearsAsCustomer > 5 ) {
    if ( totalOrders > 1000 ) {
        discountPercent = 1;

(Note, I never said it was a GOOD discount)

You can simplify this to:

if ( yearsAsCustomer > 5 && totalOrders > 1000 ) {
    discountPercent = 1;

The '&&' operator joins two boolean values into one, and gives back true if and only if both of the values are true.

Boolean logic is generally summed up in a table like this:


Note that last line:  && does NOT a check that both values are the same, it wants both values to be true before it gives up a true value.

The other operators are OR (||) and EQUALS (==).


The OR operator is friendly.  As long as one of the operands is true, it gives you true.

I think this one should be rather easy to understand.  If both operands have the same value, you get back that value.  Equals is a bit of a special case though, because you can use it with non-boolean operands as well.   (5 == 5) evaluates to true, as does (true == true).

So technically, you can do this (although my compiler warns me that I'm being silly when I do it, it reluctantly compiles and this can be run:

if ((5==5) == (true == true)) {
    System.out.println("Imagine that");

Note my use of parentheses to prioritize expressions.  I wanted to be absolutely sure that 5==5 and true == true both evaluated first, and I didn't want it to look like I was comparing 5 == true.  Now, the compiler follows standard rules for prioritizing mathematical operations, but extra parentheses can be very useful for we poor humans.

Expressions with booleans can be nested arbitrarily deep, although once you've got more than a few terms, they can be a bit difficult to work out.  Try to always give some thought to the next poor sod who has to modify your code, especially if that poor sod might be you again.

if ((isACustomer && (years > 10 || (years > 5 && sales > 1000))) || runningSpecialIncentives) {

Might be logically correct, and work just fine.  But do you want to add another condition to it first thing in the morning before you've had a cup of coffee?  Do you want to test it when someone is breathing down your neck?  This is probably a candidate for breaking up.  You can always create new booleans to act as placeholders:

boolean meetsQuotas = years > 10 || (years > 5 && sales > 1000);

Which would give the more readable:

if ((isACustomer && meetsQuotas) || runningSpecialIncentives ) {

Not only is it more readable as code, it almost makes sense as English.

The final boolean operator is !

No, that wasn't an expression of surprise.  The exclamation point is the 'NOT' operator.  It turns around the sense of any boolean expression, turning true into false and false into true.  Unlike the others I discussed above, which are binary operators (they work with two values), ! is a unary operator.  

!false == true


!true == false

So you can write:

if ( ! meetsQuotas && specialIncentives ) {
    System.out.println("We're giving a discount due to the special incentives program, but this guy is a cheapskate.");

That's about all I have to say about booleans for now.  Learn them, use them, love them.

This Should Throw You For a Loop

Hopefully you digested the information from my last post about while loops and you're feeling eager for more.  Fortunately, the rest of what you need to know about loops should come easily if you're already comfortable.

There are two other basic loop structures available to Java developers.  These are the for loop and the do/while loop.  As with the while loop, you could conceivably accomplish any looping task with either of these, but usually one or another will jump out at you as being best suited to the task at hand.

Since we've already looked at while, let's look at do/while.  We'll start with making a simple loop that duplicates the function of the first one from the while loop post:

boolean keepRunning = true;

do {
    System.out.println("I am in a loop.");
    keepRunning = false;
} while ( keepRunning );

Note that it really is the same inside the loop, only the location of the 'while', along with an added semicolon, and the addition of the word 'do' make it any different.  So why do we even have it?  The reason is that a while loop is an entry condition loop, whereas do/while is an exit condition loop.  When you reach a while loop, if the condition for which it tests is false you will never execute it at all, whereas a do loop will always execute at least once.

The difference is better illustrated if we start with 'keepRunning' set to false.

boolean keepRunning = false;

System.out.println("About to enter loop.");
while ( keepRunning ) {
    System.out.println("I am in a loop.");
System.out.println("Done with loop.");

Will generate the following output:
About to enter loop.
Done with loop.


boolean keepRunning = false;

System.out.println("About to enter loop.");
do {
    System.out.println("I am in a loop.");
} while ( keepRunning );
System.out.println("Done with loop.");

Will generate this:
About to enter loop.
I am in a loop.
Done with loop.

As with a while loop, and ignoring the possibility of multiple threads, if you ever want it to exit something needs to happen to make the exit condition evaluate to false.

That about sums up the differences between while and do/while.  Use whichever one makes the most sense based on the code you need to execute and the variables you have available to you.  You'll get a feel for it over time.  Without having done any surveys or run any metrics, I'd say that the regular while loop is used several times more often than do/while.

The other loop structure you need to know about, and perhaps the most commonly used of all, is the for loop.  It works like this:

for( starting condition ; loop conditional ; loop increment ) {
   //do something

Lean back and take a deep breath, it's not that bad.  To prove it, let's duplicate the code for looping five times (for is most commonly used for counting or iterating over some multiple part data structure).

First, a refresher.  In my previous post I put this up as how to use a while loop to generate five lines of output:

int runCount = 0;

while ( runCount < 5 ) {
    System.out.println("I am in a loop.");
    runCount ++;
This loop is an absolutely perfect candidate to use a for loop.  Here's the same thing expressed as a for:

for (int runCount = 0 ; runCount < 5 ; runCount ++ ) {
    System.out.println("I am in a loop.");

This is cleaner, more concise, and just plain shorter than the same loop expressed as a while.  It also illustrates some syntax differences of which you need to be aware.

First of all, note that 'runCount' is available ONLY within the loop parentheses and in the body of the loop.  Once you reach the closing bracket it goes out of scope.  This differs from the while loop and is a potential 'gotcha':

This is perfectly valid:

int runCount = 0;

while ( runCount < 5 ) {

System.out.println("The value of runCount is now " + runCount ); 

But this is not:

for ( int runCount = 0 ; runCount < 5  ; runCount ++ ) {

System.out.println("The value of runCount is now " + runCount ); 

You will receive a compiler error because runCount is completely unknown by the time you reach that attempt to print it out.  You could of course write it like this to get around the problem:

int runCount;

for ( runCount = 0 ; runCount < 5  ; runCount ++ ) {

System.out.println("The value of runCount is now " + runCount ); 

Note that one can pretty much mechanically translate between while and for loops.  Just move the first and third terms inside the parentheses to before the while and just before the closing curly brace.

The for loop is a natural fit for processing arrays and Collections, both of which I will be discussing soon.  You can use the value of the index variable (runCount in this case) inside the loop for all sorts of reasons, providing a counter, spitting out line numbers, whatever you need.

By convention, when you create an index variable in a for loop, and have no particular name for it, we tend to just use the letter i.  You'll see this kind of thing a lot:

for ( int i = 0 ; i < 10 ; i++ ) {
  System.out.println("Loop iteration " + i );

Well, to be fair, you'll see something that starts that way but actually DOES stuff a lot.

It is also possible to embed one loop inside of another.  You can't use 'i' again, so we move on to 'j' (then 'k', 'l', etc. if we want to go nuts.  Try not to go nuts).

This is an extremely basic example of that:

for ( int i = 0 ; i < 5 ; i++ ) {
    for ( int j = 0 ; j < 5 ; j++ ) {
        int product = i * j ;
        System.out.println (i + " X " + j + " = " + product );

These few lines of code will generate 25 lines of output:

0 X 0 = 0
0 X 1 = 0
0 X 2 = 0
0 X 3 = 0
0 X 4 = 0
1 X 0 = 0
1 X 1 = 1
1 X 2 = 2
1 X 3 = 3
1 X 4 = 4
2 X 0 = 0
2 X 1 = 2
2 X 2 = 4
2 X 3 = 6
2 X 4 = 8
3 X 0 = 0
3 X 1 = 3
3 X 2 = 6
3 X 3 = 9
3 X 4 = 12
4 X 0 = 0
4 X 1 = 4
4 X 2 = 8
4 X 3 = 12
4 X 4 = 16

The various loops are critical to your understanding of software development.  Get comfortable with them, then get more comfortable with them.

As always, if you have comments or questions, please post them.  I'd love to hear from you.

View code here

Sidenote: Integrated Development Environments

Yes, yes, I started off some posts showing DOS screens and command lines, but you know what?  You don't need to mess around with that stuff if you don't want to.  I'm not saying it's a bad thing to understand command lines, it's certainly not...  But it isn't absolutely necessary if you wish to learn Java syntax, object oriented programming, and how to build systems.

So don't make your life difficult.  Hit up Google and look for eclipse, or IntelliJ, or NetBeans (there are others, like Codenvy that you could conceivably use from a Chromebook or something).  Install one of these and you can begin to play.  They'll help you avoid errors in syntax, they'll help you look up class and method names, they'll automatically insert required syntax, and they'll show you where you screwed up so you can fix it.  Heck, they'll even offer to fix many common errors for you and usually get it right.

And you won't even have to pay for most of them.  What's not to love about that?

Going Loopy a While

Another key thing you need to understand is looping.  Repeatedly performing identical operations is extremely common in any programming language, and Java supports a pretty full set of looping structures.

Perhaps the simplest loop to understand is the while loop.  Let's write a simple one:

boolean keepRunning = true;

while ( keepRunning )  {
    System.out.println("I am in a loop.");
    keepRunning = false;
System.out.println("I am no longer in a loop.");

Now, the above code was the most pointless of all possible while loops, since it executes its code just once and stops.  Specifically:

First, we created a boolean variable and set it equal to true.  We are using this as a flag or condition for the loop.

Then we created a loop, which will execute over and over again so long as keepRunning is still true.  The while statement always expects a boolean expression in the parentheses, and executes one statement so long as that expression evaluates to true.  Curly braces along with any code inside of them count as one statement, and I strongly urge you not to skip them just because some looping or conditional structure you're using only has one line.

So the while statement executes, sees that its condition is true, so it enters the loop.

The system generates the following unexpectedly exciting output to the console:

I am in a loop.

And then it sets keepRunning to false.  The first iteration of the loop is now finished, as we hit the closing brace.

Now the program flow goes back up to the while statement.  keepRunning is now false, so the while statement will bypass the next statement (which, as I mentioned, is everything within the curly braces).

So now we pass control out of the loop and generate the following even more interesting output:

I am no longer in a loop.

That's a lot of words to describe something that is conceptually very simple, which is basically true of many programming structures.  We create instructions and that computer really has to scurry along doing a lot of different stuff for us.  Ah, the power!

Of course, a loop that doesn't loop hardly qualifies for the name, so let's do something just a bit more complex:

boolean keepRunning = true;
int runCount = 0;

while ( keepRunning ) {
    System.out.println("I am in a loop.");
    runCount = runCount + 1;
    if ( runCount > 4 )  {
        keepRunning = false;

Try to predict what will happen here.  Follow it through, it's not really that complicated.  I'll wait.

OK, there's not going to be a quiz, I'll just show the output:

I am in a loop.
I am in a loop.
I am in a loop.
I am in a loop.
I am in a loop.

Do you understand what happened here?  If so, you can skip the next bit.

We started off with two variables, keepRunning and runCount.  Let's examine the status of these during each iteration of the loop.

keepRunningrunCountWhat does loop do?
true0Prints I am in a loop.Increase runCount to 1
true1Prints I am in a loop.Increase runCount to 2
true2Prints I am in a loop.Increase runCount to 3
true3Prints I am in a loop.Increase runCount to 4
true4Prints I am in a loop.Increase runCount to 5 then sets keepRunning to false
false5Nothing! We never execute at this point, having failed the while condition

Make sure you understand the flow of that loop completely.  When it makes perfect sense to you, and you understand why everything is happening, you're ready to move on.  to the next section

I wrote that loop in pretty much the longest possible way, because I wanted the flow to be explicitly laid out and easy to follow.  Structures such as boolean flags and counters do get used, but it's rare to have two of them for a job this simple.  Most good programmers try to keep their code terse and tight, without extra fluff.  In this case, we have fluff.

If I were to write the above for myself, and I absolutely had to use a while loop to do it, I'd certainly make use of the following shortcuts:

  1. The '++' operator.  This increments a value.  There's also a similar '--' operator.  I could replace 'runCount = runCount + 1' with 'runCount ++'.  My fingers will thank me, as will those reviewing the code and really expecting to see that.  Just a caveat, the increment operator can appear before OR after the variable, and if it's alone on a line it does not matter how you use it.  But if you are using it in a larger expression it matters.  If you use it as a prefix operator by putting it before the variable, the variable is incremented and then it is evaluated.  If you put it after, the variable is evaluated and then it is incremented.  SO:

    If you write:

    int i = 5;
    int product = ++i * 5;

    Then product will be 30, because it would turn to 6 before being multiplied.

    Whereas if you write:

    int i = 5;
    int product = i++ * 5;

    Then product will be 25, because it would still be 5 when multiplied.

    In either case, after the second line i will have the value 6.
  2. I would take advantage of the boolean nature of comparison operators.  In other words, I can use the value of:

    runCount > 5

    anywhere I need a conditional.  In short, I don't need 'keepRunning' at all.
Instead, I could write my loop this way:

int runCount = 0;

while ( runCount < 5 ) {
    System.out.println("I am in a loop.");
    runCount ++;

This is cleaner, shorter, and quite clear once you understand all the bits and pieces.  Indeed, it may be clearer, as there's less to track, and the exit condition of the loop is explicitly stated right where it's used.

You have no doubt noticed by now that I have been starting everything at 0, not 1, which may feel a bit strange.  This is just something you will have to get used to, as it is extremely common for developers to do things that way.  This is most likely due to the way arrays (and pointers in some languages) function, where the first element is zero.  We'll talk about arrays in another post.

Naturally, we sometimes get the counters a bit wrong, perhaps we compared against the wrong value, or used an equals check when we should have used a less than check.  Most of the time, we get this wrong by one.  Always check your logic and indexes thoroughly, particularly before it feels really natural to you.  We call these off-by-one errors fencepost errors.  The reason for this comes down to this:  Imagine you go to your local Home Labyrinth store because you want to put up a hundred feet of fence.  The fence panels are 10 feet wide and you need 10 of them.  You also need posts to go between each panel, and because you haven't had your coffee yet (they open early and you're feeling ambitious this Saturday) you also buy 10 posts.  Everything is going great until you reach the end and realize you need an eleventh post at the far end.  (Usually this happens three minutes after the store closes, in my experience).

There are several other loop structures as well, which I'll discuss next time around.  I want you to get this simplest one locked down firmly before we move on.  It would be possible to only use this one kind of loop and write almost any program, but some of the others are better suited to certain tasks.

View code here

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Variables and How To Use 'em

We've touched upon variables here and there in the previous few posts, and it occurred to me that I should probably clarify their purpose and use.

Programs would be remarkably useless if all you could do was hard code actual values into them.  So what we do is use symbolic representations of numbers, characters, words, etc.  This is similar to algebra, in that we often use 'x', 'y' and other such letters to represent numbers.  They act like placeholders.  Maybe it's better to think of a variable as a shoe box.  You can keep something in the box, and put a label on the box, too.

Let's start off with some very basic examples:

int one = 1;

No, you probably won't use 'one' as a variable name very often, but it's valid Java to do so.  We've created a label called "one" and assigned it the numeric value 1 in one fell swoop (or swell foop, if you prefer).  So we have a shoe box, with a label on it that says "one", and that has the number 1 inside of it.

Now here's why 'one' is a bad variable name:

one = one + 1;

Now one is equal to 2, and we've got the beginning of a comedy routine.

We can perform all kinds of basic math operations on integer variables this same way.

one = one * 2;

one = one / 2;

one = one - 1;

Assuming that all five lines of code above were run in a program, what would one now equal?

Well, it started out as 1, then we added 1 so it became 2.  Then we multiplied by 2 to get 4, divided by 2 to get 2, and then subtracted 1 to get back to 1.

Following chained sequences of events is an important skill for the programmer.  You need to be able to understand what each line of code will do to each variable and keep track of these things as you essentially simulate the program's run in your mind.  This can get very involved, and there's no shame in writing down the state of each variable after each step in a table format.

Of course, 'int' is just one data type, and a limited one at that.  It can't represent decimals easily for instance, and it's fairly hopeless at representing a word processing document.  But it's a start.  I don't intend to provide a complete reference to all data types here, but some basic examples include:

int - Represents an integer (whole number). Examples include 5, 18 and 42
double - Represents a double precision decimal number.  5.1842 could be a double
boolean - Represents a true or false value, which is really useful for conditionals and loops.  Must be either true or false

All of these types share the distinction that they are actual basic data types (atomic types), not objects.  There are objects in the Java library which can be used (fairly interchangeably) in their places.  The equivalent object representations for int, double and boolean are Integer, Double and Boolean.  We'll discuss those in another post, but for now I just want to point out that as a general rule (and you should follow it) object types will begin with an upper case letter, and that will help you to know what you're dealing with.  Of course, over time you'll get very used to the limited menu of atomic types and recognize them quickly.

 There are many mathematical operations one can perform with these data types, some to change them, some to test them.  We addressed some basic arithmetic operators above.

Sometimes you need to test variables for their values.  You can determine equality, or which number is greater by using comparison operators.  The first comparison operator you probably want to know about is equality.  We use a double equal sign for this (==).  This must not be confused with the assignment operator (=)!  Many logical errors in programs have cropped up from confusing these two, and they can sometimes be hard to find.  When quickly scanning through a couple of pages of code, the difference between:

if (n = 5)


if (n == 5)

can be hard to spot.  A trick that works surprisingly well for some developers is turning this around.  Basically, "if (5 == n)" is precisely equivalent to "if (n == 5)", but writing "if (5 = n)" is an error the compiler can catch because you cant assign a variable to a constant, only the other way around.  This is sometimes referred to as Yoda style or Yoda syntax.  Interesting is it not?

Technically, these comparison operators wind up evaluating to boolean values.  So it's perfectly OK to do something like this:

boolean nEquals5 = (5 == n);

We will go into booleans in more depth at another time, but for now I just want to point out that you can combine booleans with AND, OR and NOT operators (&&, ||, !) to evaluate more complex questions.

Hopefully, that's enough to keep you from getting too confused as we get into some examples going forward.  If you have questions, please feel free to post them, and I'll try to answer as quickly as I can.  The areas where people have difficulty are where I want to concentrate.

View code here

Wednesday, November 12, 2014


Functions, and their close cousins methods, are fundamental to software development.  Syntactically, there is no real difference between the two.  They really only differ in terms of the context in which they operate.  Technically, functions should not depend on anything except the information they are given.  If you call a function called 'add' with 2 and 3 as parameters, it should always return 5 regardless of what else might be going on inside your system.  A method called 'add' might only be given one parameter, and be expected to operate in a context where it is aware of some other number to which the parameter will be added.  Please note that it quite possible to write your code so that it does not abide by these rules, but it's probably not in your best interest to do so.

Suppose we want to write that function mentioned above, 'add'.  Furthermore, let's suppose we want it to be made available to any class that wants to call it, and that it is expected to do only integer (whole number) arithmetic.  We might write it like this:

    public static int add ( int number1, int number2 ) {
        return number1 + number2;

This is of course simplistic, and probably better accomplished in-line where you need to perform the addition, but that's the nature of an example.

This function should be easy enough to understand once you understand the required syntax.  It starts off by being declared 'public', which means any other class can call it.  By declaring it 'static' we've indicated that we do not wish to have to create an object in order to call the function.  It has to give back an integer value to the code that calls it, so we put that up there, too.  Then we have the name of the method, followed by parentheses.  Inside the parentheses is a list of parameters (which can be empty).  Parameters are just variables given to a function from an outside source.  Note that every time it's given the same set of parameters it will give back the same result.  There are no hidden variables or shared secrets that will affect its operation and change the return value.

If I want to use add in this same class I can just write:

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int answer = add ( 2 , 3 );
        System.out.println("The answer is " + answer );

This will call 'add', which will see number1 as having the value 2, and number 2 as having the value 3.  Then add will then return 2 + 3, which is of course 5.  Because it's a return value, we can use the equal sign to set 'answer' to the returned value.  So 'answer' becomes 5, and we print out:

The answer is 5

Naturally, most useful functions will do a bit more than this, and they can in fact get very complicated, calling other functions and methods to do all sorts of tasks.  Returning a value is strictly optional, but you must declare the 'return type' for every function you write.  If you do not wish to have a return value, you can declare the return type as 'void'.  If you do declare a return type that is not void, you must ensure that you return an appropriate value when your function ends.  This would be an error and would fail to compile:

    int badAdd( int value1, int value2 ) {
        if ( value1 < 100 ) {
            return value1 + value2;
     //Fails to compile!

I've introduced another new concept here, a conditional statement in the form of 'if'.  This is another key concept, the idea of taking some action only if a specific condition is met.  In this case, if the value of 'value1' is less than 100 we'd execute all of the code between the brackets immediately following the if.  Technically the brackets are not required if you only have one line of code, but now forget I ever said that and just use them.  Many hours have been lost to misunderstandings that crop up from failing to use brackets where they can be.  Don't waste minutes (or worse, fail to notice a problem) by saving a half a second of typing and a couple of characters of disk space.

There are ways to get around returning a value in case of error conditions, which I will discuss under the topic of Exceptions at a later date.

View code here

Project Organization Part 1: Directory Layout

In our first post we set up a simplified project called HelloWorld.  That is of course, a very standard first program in virtually any language, designed to provide a minimal functional program to provide a bit of user output.  That's all well and good, but in the interest of getting something built I glossed over or just plain ignored some aspects of project setup.

First and foremost, we allowed the source code and the compiled .class files to sit in the same location.  I was tempted to avoid that even for the first post, but eventually decided it was best to just get something done and tackle that in a separate post.  So here we are.

As a general rule, I greatly prefer to set up my projects with two main directory trees, one for source files and one for build products.  Typically I'll use the names src and build for these directories.  You will find that once you start using an IDE this structure will tend to be built automatically for you, which will make it transparent and natural.

So let's take HelloWorld and convert it to a better structure:

Now we've got a couple of buckets for our files.  For now we'll ignore packaging and just rearrange the files.  Since class files can be regenerated at any time, we'll just get rid of HelloWorld.class.  We will then move to its new home.

Now let's rebuild our class file to make sure we can still operate.  Go into the build directory and run javac, but this time you'll have to enter a relative path in order for the system to find it.  After that you can, if you so choose, do a test run to make sure it still works correctly.

I mentioned earlier that we're not going to discuss packaging, but I do want to quickly mention that we still have not gone far enough with moving our files around.  The reason for this involves the way that Java loads classes, and has no real implications until you start assembling slightly larger programs.  Suffice it to say that we're not done yet, but we can wait a while before we get into that.  Next time around, we'll talk about functions, which will be a key concept you must understand before we get around to creating objects.

Getting Started with Java (Hello, World)

I spend some time on the subreddit /r/javahelp, and see many of the same questions and errors crop up again time after time.  People who are trying to learn how to program get caught up in the syntax, and wind up down the rabbit hole.

So let's take a look at the very basics of Java.

The basic unit of Java programming is the class.  We define a class by creating a text file (with a .java extension) according to some strict rules, then we compile the .java file to a .class file using the javac command.  Better yet, we use an Integrated Development Environment, but I will discuss that in a future post.

Your source code files, which is what we call the .java text files, can be created with any text editor.  Notepad will work fine for these early examples, but there are certainly better ones out there.  Even for your first efforts, you will want a clean work area free of clutter, so it is best to create a new directory somewhere on your hard drive for each project on which you will work.  I prefer to base everything under a "\Dev" directory so that all of my work is in one easily identifiable place.  Since my main system at home uses a solid state drive plus a storage drive, that means my work area is inside of "D:\Dev".  I'm going to write everything here as though I'm using the C: drive, though, since that's more likely to be what you are using.

We want to have a directory for our project, which will be where we go to do all of our work on any given task.  Finally, while this may not seem very important right now, it's best not to cluster your source files right there in the project directory.  So I like to have a 'src' directory in which to save my source code files.

So, since by convention our first project is "Hello World", we wind up saving our .java to the following directory:


There is one additional complication relating to source, which is what we call "packages".  I'll defer discussion of this for the time being, but they are set up in your workspace as directories off of the src directory above.

So, that being said, what does Hello, World look like in Java?  It quite literally cannot get any simpler than the following example:

Everything here is necessary to the task at hand.  Let's go through it line by line:

public class HelloWorld {

Every java class needs to be declared.  While there are a few other possibilities for this line, this is the most common way in which you will declare your classes.  The word 'public' means this class can be seen (and ultimately used to do work) by any other class that knows about this project.  We are defining a class, and giving it the name 'HelloWorld'.  By convention we always start our classes with an upper case letter, and follow that with what is called "Camel Case", which means lower case words with upper case initial letters.

Finally, there is an opening curly bracket, which matches the curly bracket on the very last line.  Curly brackets (or braces) are going to be your close companions as you work with Java, so get used to them.  They are always 'balanced', meaning that each opening bracket '{' has to be matched by a closing bracket '}'.

public static void main(String[] args) {

Next up, we have 'main'.  Any command line Java program will start at main, and main is always declared the same way.  The only thing you can really change here is the name 'args', which is arbitrary.  Command line switches and parameters will be found in args, and although we aren't making use of them in this program, we still have to mention the possibility.  Again, we have an opening bracket.  Any 'method' (or 'function') you create in a Java class will have a set of brackets around its code.

System.out.println("Hello, world!");

Here's the only line that actually does something in our little demonstration.  It writes the literal value Hello, world! to the console output.  All Java programs (and indeed, all programs in most languages have 'standard output' and 'standard input' available by default for simple user interaction.


These two lines are just needed to balance the brackets.  The first closes the definition of "main", the second closes the definition of the class HelloWorld.

Presuming that a Java Development Kit is available and configured correctly, this can be built with the 'javac' command.:
Compiling HelloWorld
If we get no error messages, we should now have the file "HelloWorld.class" sitting here as well.

Now we can run it with the 'java' command:
Running HelloWorld

In a future installment, I will discuss further organization of the project space.  There are good reasons not to mix all the .java and .class files in one place.  Integrated Development Environments make all of these tasks simpler, and I definitely recommend obtaining IntelliJ IDEA or Eclipse or NetBeans (or all three).

View code here